There are moments when events in the world land heavily, not because they are new, but because they reveal something enduring about human nature. Writing, in those moments, can serve less as expression and more as careful observation. What follows is offered in that spirit. It seems that the prevailing way views are shared now is through recirculating articles written by those who already agree with us. This is an attempt to share something more personal than that.
Again and again, a single event unfolds in public view and yet gives rise to sharply different interpretations. The facts may be shared. The meaning is not.
This difference does not seem rooted in intelligence or moral failure. It appears more closely tied to conditioning, values, and the frameworks through which people are taught to understand safety, justice, and responsibility.
When a life is lost in a moment of conflict, one view centers on the human being who stepped into danger out of concern for others believed to be treated unfairly. Another view centers on the officer who acted in accordance with the law as it was understood, believing restraint would create greater risk. Both positions often arise from a sincere sense of duty.
Those who witness such events are shaped by similar frameworks. People oriented toward human rights tend to see an irreversible harm that outweighs all procedural concerns. People oriented toward legal justice tend to see a tragic but lawful outcome that preserves order. These interpretations are often treated as moral opposites, though they may be better understood as different starting points.
Two broad orientations appear again and again. One begins with the belief that systems and rules are necessary to protect the collective. The other begins with the belief that human dignity stands above any system meant to govern it.
Neither orientation exists alone. Justice is defined in relation to injustice. Order is understood in contrast to disorder. These tensions are not defects in human society. They are the conditions through which meaning takes shape.
Conflict arises when these differing frameworks meet without patience or curiosity, and when certainty replaces listening.
Robert Heinlein described the role of a “fair witness,” someone trained to observe without interpretation, to state only what occurred without adding judgment or narrative. This role points to a skill that feels increasingly relevant.
Witnessing is not disengagement. It is restraint. It asks that perception come before reaction, and that description come before conclusion. It does not require abandoning values, only holding them lightly enough to see clearly.
There may be room for human growth here, not through agreement, but through careful seeing.
History offers examples of this discipline lived out. Nelson Mandela, after years of imprisonment, invited a former jailer to share a meal. The man, aware of the harm he had caused, broke down in tears. Mandela later spoke of forgiveness as something that liberates the one who offers it. Not because the past is erased, but because resentment no longer governs the present.
Buddhist teaching expresses a similar understanding. Hatred does not end through hatred. It ends through love. This is not sentimentality, nor is it denial. It is a refusal to let opposition turn into dehumanization.
When conviction meets opposition, the question becomes how to respond without reinforcing the very harm one hopes to prevent. Public protest and direct action have their place and their history. So does a quieter resistance that operates through presence, restraint, and care.
Love, when practiced deliberately, becomes a form of protest. Grace, when extended without calculation, interrupts cycles of retaliation. Peace, when chosen repeatedly, resists being defined as passivity.
Human beings share a common origin and a shared dependence on this earth. While paths differ, the task remains the same: to navigate difference without destroying one another, and to pursue justice without losing sight of life itself.
These reflections are offered not as answers, but as observations, held lightly and open to revision.
May all beings feel safe. May all beings feel loved.
Jan
Leave a comment